09th October 2002
Dr. John Owens
Chairman - Mental Health Commission
c/o Ms. Adele Gannon
Mental Health Services
Floor 5, Hawkins House
Hawkins Street
Dublin 2
Dear Dr. Owens
At the recent Committee meetings of the Irish
College of Psychiatrists, the role of the Mental Health Commission
and the new Mental Health Act have been discussed. We are keen
to hear about the state of development of the Commission at this
stage and also to set up a meeting with members of the Commission
as soon as it is operational.
As the main representative body of the psychiatric
profession in Ireland we would be very keen to work in partnership
with the Mental Health Commission to ensure the effective operation
of the Mental Health Act and to assist in the matter of promoting
quality in mental health care in Ireland.
Psychiatrists are in support of the Mental
Health Act and are eager to see it operational. However, as you
are aware there are serious concerns about the resource implications
and operational issues. The Law Sub-Committee of the Irish College
of Psychiatrists is presently preparing a submission on a Code
of Practice for the Mental Health Act. This is in draft form at
present and as soon as it is finalised we will be approaching
yourself and the Commission with a view to holding discussions
around it.
We wish to discuss progress and developments
in relation to the new Mental Health Services Inspectorate. We
are also interested in knowing what views the Commission have
on the shape of the new Inspectorate.
The College would certainly welcome a reformed Inspectorate and
would take the view that this Inspectorate should be involved
in the full range of mental health services.
Given the amount of specialisation that has
taken place in the last 20 years within psychiatry it would be
our view that the composition of the new Inspectorate should reflect
the various specialties and subspecialties. We would wish
to have an Inspectorate that takes a standardised approach to
the inspection of mental health services. This would include measuring
standards against professionally and internationally recognized
acceptable standards of service delivery. The profession would
also be keen to see the Inspectorate’s Report as a tool that is
used to lobby for improvements in mental health service delivery.
Generally speaking the profession welcomes
the new Mental Health Commission and changes to the Inspectorate
- and are willing to work in a spirit of partnership. We are also
acutely aware of the need to avoid any adversarial relationships
between the profession and the Commission.
At our recent meeting there was some concern
expressed around comments attributed to you in the Irish Medical
Times on July 26th 2002. I have also received numerous
representations of concern from members of the profession in relation
to these comments, especially with regard to the Commission’s
role in regard to the prescription of ECT and psychotropic drugs.
The profession rejects the notion that the Commission would have
a role in drawing up protocols for ECT or the prescription of
drugs.
The College would advocate an evidence-based
approach to the use of drugs and ECT in psychiatry. As you are
aware the American Psychiatric Association and the Royal College
of Psychiatrists already have evidence-based protocols on the
use of ECT which can be referenced by the profession. The notion
that individual psychiatrists would be answerable to the Mental
Health Commission for their practice in the use of ECT or drugs
is not acceptable to our members. There are already structures
in place, which will deal with these various matters i.e. Competence
Assurance structures which will be dealt with by the Medical Council,
Continuing Professional Development and Education which is being
addressed by the Colleges, and contractual matters relating to
clinical independence, which is the consideration of the IMO and
IHCA.
I would be seriously concerned about a perception
emerging that the Mental Health Commission would have a role in
the policing of the practice of the profession. This perception
would prove unhelpful as we endeavor to establish positive working
relationships.
Again, I would like to reiterate our support
for the Mental Health Commission and the Act - obviously taking
into account our above concerns. I believe it would be very helpful
if we could meet as soon as possible in order to clarify matters
and to set a working agenda.
With kind regards.
Dr. Colette M Halpin
Chairman
|